interesting.
'Comedian-turned-activist Russell Brand has caused a fresh bout of controversy after claiming on his YouTube channel that a “corrupt” British society is the reason ‘Jihadi John’ was radicalized.
In the video ‘Could I have been Jihadi John?’ released on Tuesday, the self-styled revolutionary reacts to the revelation of the militant’s identity.
Brand claimed the radicalization of the Islamic State executioner, Mohammed Emwazi, is Britain’s fault....'
Not the killings, the radicalization.
Change the labels?
Jihad for War on Terror.
Easy.
.
Jihad John is not responsible for USA drone strikes? Is this a radical statement?
No comments:
Post a Comment