It was the Caliphs of Islam who began the burning of heretics...

'The Islamic State posted a religious edict on Twitter, which ruled that it is permissible in Islam to burn an infidel to death.

However, senior clerics across the Islamic world argued that inflicting death by fire was always banned under Islam.


'In Qatar, the International Association of Muslim Scholars, headed by prominent cleric Youssef al-Qaradawi and linked to the Muslim Brotherhood that has influence across the region, called the burning of Kasaesbeh a criminal act.
"The Association asserts that this extremist organisation does not represent Islam in any way and its actions always harm Islam," it said.


"The Prophet, peace be upon him, advised against burning people with fire," Sheikh Hussein bin Shu'ayb, head of the religious affairs department in southern Yemen, told Reuters in Aden.

Saudi cleric Salman al-Odah wrote on his Twitter account: "Burning is an abominable crime rejected by Islamic law regardless of its causes."
"It is rejected whether it falls on an individual or a group or a people. Only God tortures by fire," he added.
 http://in.reuters.com/article/2015/02/04/mideast-crisis-jordan-clerics-idINKBN0L814Q20150204

 Well you don't have to be a genius to guess that al Caliph with a PhD in Islamic Studies and theocratic leader of a Caliphate has an islamic precedent or two up his sleeve.

During the 'Riddah Wars'...which means Wars of Apostasy:


'Abu Bakr even set the example when a captive who had fought against the Muslims was brought to him.  Abu Bakr

ordered a fire to be kindled with much firewood in the prayer yard (musalla) of Medina and threw him, with arms and legs bound, into it.
The History of al-Tabari: The Conquest of Arabia, p. 80

 http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/dr-stephen-m-kirby/islam-and-burning-people-alive/

'Muhammad promised regarding anyone who abandoned Islam, Abu Bakr said, to “burn them with fire, slaughter them by any means,..'

 and Abu Bakr, they say, is an honourable Rightly Guided Caliph.

That's what I call class.

MLK for Moloch ; Repaid in Kind

MLK for Moloch; Islamic State executes Jordanian Captured Airman.
Bomber repaid in kind.

This will be a real crowd pleaser in the Islamic State and signifies their complete victory.
That is, a Collateral Damage pleaser and the ability to pull this of  shows their consolidation of power in the sunni muslim nation which  is complete now.

Jordan refused to exchange prisoners of war with the Islamic State in breach of... some toilet paper, I would then presume, that is not feared at all.
--
'ISIS threatened to executed the pilot, unless female jihadist Sajida al-Rishawi, held in a Jordanian prison, is released and handed over to ISIS.

The Jordanian officials reportedly refused to go ahead with the swap for Sajida al-Rishawi, because they did not receive proof that Moaz al-Kasaesbeh was alive.

The Islamic State granted Lt. Kasaesbeh the type of death he had been dealing to the defenseless children throughout Iraq, Syria, and possibly elsewhere. What went around, came around for him. Trapped in a confined space, he painfully burned to death.

Mainstream press is now in overdrive, calling the pilot’s death martyrdom, saying he paid with his life for freedom for us all, and glorifying war he helped to perpetuate. David “my values are Jewish values” Cameron paid tribute to the pilot and called his death the “sickening murder by ISIL’s barbaric terrorists“. None of them gives a poop about all the children he had burned to a crisp alive. ..'
http://www.bestgore.com/execution/jordan-pilot-execution-video-burned-to-death-in-cage-isis/

This is infact what 'let the punishment fit the crime' and 'An Eye for an Eye' means.
Such is justice?

Or unjust?

The Hebrews got that law from...the prior Law Code of Mesopotamia, no less.
No hidden black sites involved with this lot; they stand by their Law.
Serial Killers are criminals who hide their crimes...

 http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2015/02/04/396161/West-policy-towards-ISIL-blowing-back

Counter Terrorism and Regenticide in Carthage - The Warning of Moloch

Now is a festival of children young and old, of whom I count in myself in this good season.
Should it be a bad time? I would not recommend it to be a bad time.

But darker events in the political realms of ancient Kings and would-be kings exist. It may be better for Halloween.

And such is Moloch which is MLK molok, derived from the word Melech, King/Ruler.
The clues are there in it being rare, of the nobility and hidden bastards of the King. And the Best, they said. This it can be noted was not a part of the religion of the gods, of Baal. It is instead political.

King Solomon of Israel build a number of temples and shrines to god like Chemosh-Sol, sex goddess Astarte but also to demons, including a Moloch in the vale of Hell which is Gehenna or gehinnom vale. Quite a nice park in reality. But fables and stories can get exploited and carried away in the enthusiasm.

'The Best should be chosen as next King!'
The best is a mark; in arab custom the best of the royals/or nobles is chosen as the new tribal ruler/Chief or King. Such a custom works today well in Sauid Arabia. But it conflicts with the obvious line of succession used in European Monarchies for good or ill. This custom worked against The Prophet Mohammed's chosen successor Ali the 'greatest swordsman of Arabia', as he was young, and in favour of the very capable Abu Bakr, a land owner in Medina, who became first Caliph.
Such then were the plots against the King and succession by accepted arab standards?
But not so accepted by Kings of old.

The Carthage nobility was a plutocracy based on wealth rather than title. Wealth is usually inherited so there was little difference at times. It was a benevolent plutocracy that could rival the King, before Carthage became a republic,  and provided work and pay to all the population for political stability which worked so well it was recommended as a model of stable and good government. This way peace and prosperity could endure; which was favoured. Such success would be disfavored in America and UK and Europe ofcourse. And is. For...can All be King?

There are no mentions of Moloch in the Baal Legends; it is the opposite of the life giving hedonistic Baal gods of prosperity and life enjoyment. Fire is not rain after all. But rather it's antagonist, like Mot or Yaw, dangers of the desert drought, and conversely of waters and oceans too.

Being of the nobles and their hidden plots, Moloch had no part in the lives of the common citizens. Nor usually the merchant-nobles either. It had no connection to the Baal cult and was rather a dark inversion of the usual idea.  Moloch was a political demon, a sign and warning against...terrorism and regicide and revolt. Of a type of revolt anyway.

For in trying to make a noblest of them all to become king, instead they were preparing the sacrifice to be made along with a lamb... foreboding dark evil.

Jesus a Christ would be king of the Jews; and was executed as such by Jew and Roman. In this chaos to the Christians he was declared the lamb of god; which represented the for-saker demon-god EL as Moloch, as as demi-urge tyrant. Such was the disaster, as the battle of Uhud almost was to the then still Moslems of Allah when Hu'Bal (hu'Baal For Baal) showed his might with the Meccan Army.

I will not speak more of plaything Balah since events have led to an estrangement with Baal. So it was with Yahweh and Asherah (an Ashtaroth).

Better festival then is now before us. A gift of the ancient druids. Of Joy and a child's delight. Such joy was very much the idea of the cult of the Baals, of whom Moloch was not.

And of Imperial Rome;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claudius
'...However, after the deaths of Caligula's wife and daughter, it became apparent that Cassius intended to go beyond the terms of the conspiracy and wipe out the Imperial family.^[10]
.

.fuck em