Thursday, 8 January 2015
Al Qaeda Yemen did not Kill Speach ; PC Feminism did
http://www.nohatespeechmovement.org/
?
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2441
https://www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_cha_chapter44_rule156
(vi) Collective punishments. Collective punishments are prohibited by Additional Protocol II,[183] and customary international law (see Rule 103). This prohibition is also set forth in the legislation of many States.[184] This war crime is listed in the Statutes of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and of the Special Court for Sierra Leone.[185] In addition, collective punishments constitute a war crime because they consist of the deprivation of the right to fair trial (see Rule 100) and may also constitute cruel treatment (see Rule 90). References to more practice can be found in the commentary to Rule 103. [USA in Gitmo etc](vii) Using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including by impeding relief supplies. This practice is a violation of Additional Protocol II,[186] and customary international law (see Rule 53). In addition, there is very extensive State practice expressing outrage at such acts in non-international armed conflicts, including the impediment of relief supplies which caused the starvation of civilians. This practice proves that such behaviour is not only a violation of customary international law, but also, in the eyes of the international community, a very serious violation. [USA in Iraq, Ukraine against pro-Russia]
(i) Making civilian objects, that is, objects that are not military objectives, the object of attack.
http://rt.com/uk/220655-extortionate-cost-safeguarding-assange/
http://news.sky.com/story/1403776/paris-gunmen-are-skilful-professional-killers
It was not intended to be a manual
'(ii) Other serious violations of international humanitarian law committed during an international armed conflict (continued):• making the civilian population or individual civilians, not taking a direct part in hostilities, the object of attack;• launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated;• making non-defended localities and demilitarized zones the object of attack;• subjecting persons who are in the power of an adverse party to physical mutilation...'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment