Monday 12 January 2015

Anonymous Web-Censorship

They are Anonymous, censoring the web so governements don't have to. ?
Clueless?
Expect it.

And outraged supporters of The Terrorist AQ-affiliated shariah-jihad-&-Caliphate-MB Free Syrian Army/Hamas/Muslim-Brotherhood Syria, because the payed Western Media told them so. Media saturation seemed to work as a brain-washer with them. Rather than critical thinking of why are they doing this?
Which makes bombing hospitals and shooting up ambulances ok?
Clueless.
Expected it.

Now they want to take down 'terrorist' jihadi websites the USA governments leaves up? REALLY?
CIA-OK sites? Or have they changed their mind.
(unusual activity alert!)


'All photos anonymous;Fighter A aims his AK47 in Daraa “I do not want to mention my name,” said a 20-year-old FSA fighter, “because the camp we practiced in was highly classified.” So classified, in fact, that the CIA—which are rumored to be running the camp (but declined to comment for this article)—still won’t acknowledge it exists. For nearly a year, rumors have swirled about a covert, US-run training camp for FSA fighters in the vast Jordanian desert. (Jordanian intelligence also did not respond to requests for comment on this article.) And, last week, it was reported that the Obama administration appears to be expanding "its covert program of training and assistance for the Syrian opposition." However, despite all this speculation Read full coverage

Speaking of unhinged censorship:
'...That's just what the French ruling class deems to be the meaning of Dieudonné's Quenelle. On the basis of their prejudice, the artist and anyone who displays the gesture in public is subject to prosecution. That's not just censorship; it is state persecution for having an opinion.
Evidently, it's acceptable to insult Islam, according to Western select use of free speech because it suits political agendas of demonizing Muslim countries so that they can be attacked with Western warplanes or covert terrorist proxies. But it is not acceptable to satirize Zionism or Western ruling classes.
And here is another revealing touchstone. Why is Press TV banned from British terrestrial and satellite television broadcasting? Why is the Iran-based channel banned across Europe and North America? Where is Western free speech in that case? What is the problem?
Press TV is not tolerated. It is banished. Because the truth of Western state terrorism, as practiced by the likes of Sarkozy, Hollande, Obama and Cameron is too much to bear for how it might enlighten and empower public opinion. The truth of Western-sponsored state terrorism as practiced by the genocidal Israeli regime is too much to bear for public discourse; any criticism is shoved down the memory hole under the spurious pretext of "anti-Semitism." The fact that Western leaders should be prosecuted for war crimes is too much to bear. All such views, no matter how intellectually rigorous, morally scrupulous and legally substantiated, must be censored, and those who articulate them must be hounded into isolation.
Western free speech is nothing but a cynical charade by those in power to maintain their unlawful positions of power.
A satirical magazine championed by Western war criminals for its "free speech" to dehumanize Muslims is hailed as "heroic?" While an informative, serious news channel like Press TV is banned. Now that is farcical cartoon.'


'Most political parties in the opposition support the government's ban – including the main right-wing party (UMP)[39] and The Greens, whose leader Eva Joly compared Dieudonné to Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik.[40]

The leader of the far-right party National Front, Marine Le Pen, stated that she had "no opinion about the quenelle" and that politicians should speak about serious subjects such as unemployment, poverty or deindustrialization, not about quenelles....'

No comments:

Post a Comment